Forum

  • Page:
  • 1

Percent Complete

OFFLINE
Joined On:
30 Sep 2017

Percent Complete

18 November 2010 4:30
What is the best method to use for determining the percentage completion for a project (man-hours or cost) ? Some projects specially the industrial one the cost of procurement activities for the equipments are very high comparing to the cost of the construction activities, in the meantime, the man-hours of the procurement activities is very low comparing to the construction activities. When a share holder or an employer ask a question what is the overall percentage completion of the project You may present the overall percentage completion of a project by one of the two scenarios: 1.Man-hour basis But the problem that at some stages of the project The employer might make a comparison between what he have spent of the project budget and the overall percentage completion of the project and he will find out that he spent a considerable amount of the project budget but the project have not been progressed as expected. 2. Cost basis If you use the cost basis to present the overall percentage there will be a big differences between the overall percentage on the documents and the actual status on site. I solved this problem by presenting the two scenarios together and explaining the situation and why it look like that, but is there is a method that combine both together (man-hours and cost) or any other method.
OFFLINE

Re: Percent Complete

18 November 2010 4:31
I think you need to report on both metrics because they really are different, and much of the accuracy (or ability for the two metrics to align) is subject to how the costs are tracked. This flows over into the earned value system, and here are some comments about the use of cost loading and reports. When updating the schedule, when using EVMS with cost loaded activities, I recomment that you disconnect Remaining Duration and Percent Complete so that time and cost are updated differently. There are a number of reasons for this: • I have found that project personnel on site who provide update information (usually superintendents) are not particularly accurate at providing reasonable predictions of percent complete and when they provide those estimates, they are totally pulled out of the air (to be polite). But supers always know when an activity is going to be complete, so their estimates of remaining duration are generally very accurate. • At least with Primavera, if you leave PC and RD linked, one will change the other, but the EV metrics for Cost and Earned Value will be identical, eliminating the ability to provide SPI and CPI as different metrics and you lose the ability to really track both time and cost separately, which is vital to the EVM system. • Remaining time and percent complete very often do not really have much to do with each other, especially if costs were not segregated such as to pull large values out of time related durations. So if a light fixture package is worth $100,000 of the $200.000 value of the activity, and the “Install Light Fixtures” activity duration is 10 days, then the work is NOT earned at a rate of $20,000/day, but rather the package value of $100,000 is earned on the first day of installation (or before) and the earned value of the work is $10,000/day. So, the activity has earned 50% of the value on the first day, and the remaining 50% is earned over the next 10 days. And, many contractors do not separate out the delivered materials values (in fact, often Contracting Officers have heartburn over this better approach), so many EVM systems are faulty. This means that man-hours and percent complete are not closely correlated UNLESS the cost loading was done carefully by pulling out all the costs that are not proportional to the durations. • If the RD and PC are left linked, and the Contractor is updating with RD, the CM on the project is likely going to either hold back invoices because they are overly aggressive (since they may earn more money than the RD shows), or require the Contractor to increase PC values such to improve the predictions of completion which will provide an overly optimistic prediction of completion.
OFFLINE
Joined On:
30 Sep 2017

Re: Percent Complete

2 December 2010 9:33
Further to the Comments Made Above, this is a common scenario in most projects prior to reporting on Progress Achieved it is imperative to identify and agree on the reporting structure  with the key project stakeholders,  Let the Client know in advance to assess the progress on both the parameters  1. Time Progress : Gives Actual % complete against plan % (Time) 2. Value of Work (VOWD) Progress : Gives Actual % Complete against plan % ( Value of Work) 3. Critical Path Analysis on Update : Gives the most important answer when the project is going to be complete, what is critical path on the update, what are near critical sections, issues needing focus and attention. The Progress Performance need be looked at from these three parameters and should not be mixed. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Physical Progress Report - Based on either Resource Man-hours or easier way of time weightage pointers utilizing the Progress Update Feature provided by the System. Benefit of Time Weightage pointers is especially for properly reporting in detail the pre-construction stage works alogwith the Construction Stage Works. The Disadvantage faced by Planners is that most of pre-construction works are not resource loaded. As soon as the CPM is made, even before you do any detailed resource loading and get into man-hour calculations, the system allows you to see the Forecast % Completion Values per plan on the Time Spread for different phases : Prelim, Engineering, Procurement, Construction, testing commissioning and  handover. Say the plan curve generated will have % values  On 25% Time - 20% Progress Planned (Pure Time) On 50% Time Spread - 45% Progress Planned On 75% Time Spread - 70% Progress Planned On 100% Time Spread - 100% Progress Planned Same could be done at monthly intervals. Plan Physical progress curve thus generated based on the pure time taken to get the works done across the time spread is then frozen , following which getting progress updates at much early stage even when resource mobilization, site and camp establishments are in progress is also possible within 5 mins. of making a progress run (taking into consideration that these activities are generally not resource loaded mhr loaded but need be depicted as progress). Another example would be while procurement of long lead items - you would not necessarily assign manhours for period following manufacturing to delivery to site, the progress curve generated with time weightage pointers gives a true estimate of the works accomplished on pre-construction stage.
OFFLINE
Joined On:
30 Sep 2017

Re: Percent Complete

24 December 2014 12:36
Well said Mr. Steven, I am also updating my schedule without linkage of Unit % Complete and Remaining Durations, But to do this procedure i am using following method First i enter remaining duration based on remaining quantities, in result of entring remaining duration unit % complete calculate automaticaly which often not realistic To make it realistic, I used to put 0 % to Percent Complete column and then i enter actual % Complete based on completed quantities, As i have loaded the resource of manhours, quantities and revenue to my schedule, So the actual units been updated, and based on same units, Manhours % and the Performance % calculated So the one is Physical % and the second is Finacial % The reason why i have listed above my procedure of updating is to know that is it ok, and i also want to know that is there any other way to unlink the % Complete and Reamining duration
Last Edit: 4 years, 10 months ago by Rizwan. Reason: (NULL)
OFFLINE
Joined On:
12 Jul 2019

学校官网文凭加拿大Dal毕业 证书(Q微信770882133)戴尔豪斯大学毕业 证成绩单 Dal真实学历认证教育部认证@认证教育部认证毕业证

30 November -0001 12:00
学校官网文凭加拿大Dal毕业 证书(Q微信770882133)戴尔豪斯大学毕业 证成绩单 Dal真实学历认证教育部认证@认证教育部认证毕业证成绩单,真实使馆及留信网认证毕业证成绩单,在读证明Dalhousie University QQ/微信770882133办理毕业证,成绩单,教育部学历学位认证,使馆认证,归国人员证明,留信网认证 修改成绩单+信封申请学校,offer录取通知书,在读证明,普利茅斯大学学位证书,Plymouth毕业文凭。 毕业证成绩单/留信网认证/使馆认证/教育部认证/雅思 托福成绩单 ★★……校园学生代理,报酬丰厚。真诚期待您的加盟,微 Vic Q 770882133 QQ微信770882133办理假毕业证在国内能用吗? 公司 ◆【主营项目】: 留联系方式备用 ★★毕业証.成绩单.真实使馆认証.本科硕士学位证.真实学历认证.教育部认留服証.留信网认证.回国人员认证 挂科拿不到毕业证怎么办?找 Vic Q微770882133 毕业证丢了怎么办、 旧金山艺术大学 斯蒂文斯理工学院 韦恩州立大学 纽约城市大学 科罗拉多大学 圣何塞州立大学 旧金山州立大学 洪堡州立大学 密苏里州立大学 圣地亚哥大学 加州大学河滨分校 加州大学欧文分校 加州大学戴维斯分校 罗格斯大学 阿拉巴马大学 丹佛大学 伍斯特理工学院 加州大学 圣塔芭芭拉分校 德克萨斯大学 奥斯汀分校 马里兰大学 雪城大学 迈阿密大学 马萨诸塞大学 波士顿分校 俄勒冈州立大学 俄勒冈大学俄亥俄州立大学 俄亥俄大学南方卫理 公会大 坎伯兰大学 北卡罗来纳大学 奥本大学 美国爱荷华州立大学 爱荷华大学 加利福尼亚州立大学 纽约理工学院 密苏里大学 哥伦比亚分校加州大学 圣克鲁兹分校 亚利桑那州立大学 亚利桑那大学 纽约州立大学石溪分 校 美国东北大学 美国大学 密苏里大学 圣路易斯分校 密歇根州立大学 普渡大学 匹兹堡大学 佛罗里达州立大 学 佛罗里达大学 宾州州立大学 华盛顿州立大学 华盛顿大学 伊利诺伊大学 威斯康星大学 波士顿大学 波士顿 学院 纽约大学 南加州大学 密西根大学加州大学 洛杉矶分校乔治城大学 卡内基梅隆大学加州大学 伯克利分校 莱斯大学 翰霍普金斯大学 康奈尔大学 圣路易斯华盛顿大学 西北大学芝加哥大学 杜克大学 哥伦比亚大学 宾夕法尼亚大学 加州理工学院
  • Page:
  • 1